Premium
Statistical Comparison of Soil Map‐Unit Boundaries
Author(s) -
Nash M. H.,
Daugherty L. A.
Publication year - 1990
Publication title -
soil science society of america journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.836
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1435-0661
pISSN - 0361-5995
DOI - 10.2136/sssaj1990.03615995005400060029x
Subject(s) - transect , soil science , boundary (topology) , principal component analysis , geostatistics , range (aeronautics) , mathematics , autocorrelation , soil map , data set , statistics , multivariate statistics , geology , soil water , environmental science , spatial variability , mathematical analysis , oceanography , materials science , composite material
Locating the exact boundaries of soil map units is one of the primary objectives for soil surveyors. Statistical methods were used to assure the most accurate location. Soil spatial variability, autocorrelation function, and soil boundary locations were examined along a 2700‐m transect in southern New Mexico. Eighty‐nine observation points were equally spaced along the transect. Selected physical and chemical characteristics through the transect were determined. A multivariate method of principal‐component analysis was used to produce one set of data. These data were first inspected for stationary manner, i.e., that the mean and variance of each property remain fairly constant for each data set. Log‐normal transformation was used to detrend the data. The stationary manner of autocorrelations was tested with semivariograms. The range of dependence obtained from the autocorrelations and semivariograms was used in a squared‐Euclidean‐distance procedure to locate the soil boundaries. These boundaries were compared with those obtained by conventional soilsurvey methods. Some of the calculated boundaries agreed with those obtained by conventional soil survey. The latter method is more economical and more productive than the statistical method.