Premium
Control of Furrow Erosion With Crop Residues and Surge Flow Irrigation
Author(s) -
Miller D. E.,
Aarstad J. S.,
Evans R. G.
Publication year - 1987
Publication title -
soil science society of america journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.836
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1435-0661
pISSN - 0361-5995
DOI - 10.2136/sssaj1987.03615995005100020030x
Subject(s) - surface irrigation , irrigation , environmental science , erosion , streams , hydrology (agriculture) , infiltration (hvac) , surge , erosion control , sediment , residue (chemistry) , crop residue , agronomy , agriculture , geology , biology , ecology , materials science , geotechnical engineering , paleontology , computer network , geomorphology , computer science , composite material , biochemistry
Crop residues in irrigation furrows reduce erosion, but also increase infiltration rates. High infiltration rates decrease uniformity of irrigation along a furrow. Surge flow improves irrigation uniformity during furrow‐stream advance because the stream advances at about the same rate as with continuous flow, but requires only about one‐half as much water to reach the end of a furrow. Experiments were conducted to evaluate the combined effects of wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) and corn ( Zea mays L.) residues and surge flow irrigation on furrow erosion and irrigation uniformity. Larger than normal furrow streams (up to 30 L min −1 ) were used with surge flow to obtain rapid stream advance. Sediment discharge with such large streams was reduced from >100 Mg ha −1 d −1 from bare furrows to about 1 Mg ha −1 d −1 from furrows containing 2 Mg ha −1 of residue. Differences in erosion between surged and continuous furrow streams were small compared to those due to residues in the furrows. Residues grown in place were more effective in reducing erosion than were residues hand‐placed in clean furrows.