Premium
Effects of Clearfelling and Site Preparation on Nitrogen Mineralization in a Southern Pine Stand
Author(s) -
Burger J. A.,
Pritchett W. L.
Publication year - 1984
Publication title -
soil science society of america journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.836
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1435-0661
pISSN - 0361-5995
DOI - 10.2136/sssaj1984.03615995004800060045x
Subject(s) - clearcutting , mineralization (soil science) , nitrogen , nitrogen cycle , soil water , organic matter , chemistry , zoology , environmental science , agronomy , environmental chemistry , soil science , ecology , biology , organic chemistry
A clearcut forest site (45‐year‐old natural stand of Pinus elliottii Engelm. and Pinus palustris Mill.) was subjected to different intensities of site preparation to determine management impacts on N availability. Using a laboratory aerobic soil incubation technique, N mineralization potentials (N mineralizable over time) ( N o ) were determined to be 25.0, 23.3, and 17.7 µg/g for soils from an uncut control area; a burned and chopped area; and a bladed, disced, and bedded area, respectively. The N o of soil from the intensively treated area was significantly lower than the others when measured in the laboratory; however, simulations of field conditions indicated that more N may be mineralized in soils from intensively treated sites due to more favorable soil moisture and temperature conditions. Mineralization rates for these three areas, however, were not significantly different, and C/N ratios (28 and 26 for the chopped and bladed sites, respectively) for the clearcut and prepared areas did not suggest a difference in N availability. Ratios of organic matter/soluble carbon (OM/C a ) increased from 79 to 136 with treatment intensity and suggest that the N associated with the organic matter remaining on the most intensively treated site may be more resistant to decomposition. Nitrogen availability is a function of substrate quality and microenvironmental conditions. Harvesting and site treatment affected both of these. Laboratory determinations of N o appear to be a better index of nitrogen availability than C/N, C s , or total N, but do not adequately account for differences in mineralization due to treatment‐induced changes in the soil environment.