Premium
Evaluation of Simplified Methods for Determining Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity of Layered Soils
Author(s) -
Schuh W. M.,
Bauder J. W.,
Gupta S. C.
Publication year - 1984
Publication title -
soil science society of america journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.836
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1435-0661
pISSN - 0361-5995
DOI - 10.2136/sssaj1984.03615995004800040007x
Subject(s) - hydraulic conductivity , soil water , soil science , homogeneous , conductivity , environmental science , materials science , geology , geotechnical engineering , mathematics , chemistry , combinatorics
The simplified field method of L.R. Ahuja et al. (1980) for determining hydraulic conductivity as a function of soil water suction, K ( S ), and the simplified field method of P.L. Libardi et al. (1980) for determining hydraulic conductivity as a function of soil water content, K (θ), were compared with the instantaneous profile method, to evaluate their suitability for estimating hydraulic conductivity of layered soil. The Ahuja method worked well on coarse and fine‐textured soils and complex soil profiles with stratification. The Libardi method worked well on coarse and fine‐textured, homogeneous materials and homogeneous parent materials underlying stratified soil materials. A calculated matching value ( K o ) was used with the Libardi method. Within layered soil materials slopes of the K (θ) curves, calculated with the Libardi method, were adequate; however, calculated K o values were often inadequate. Fit of calculated values with measured values of hydraulic conductivity could have been improved by using field‐determined K o values.