Premium
Use of an Internal Standard with Differential X‐ray Diffraction Analysis for Iron Oxides
Author(s) -
Bryant R. B.,
Curi N.,
Roth C. B.,
Franzmeier D. P.
Publication year - 1983
Publication title -
soil science society of america journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.836
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1435-0661
pISSN - 0361-5995
DOI - 10.2136/sssaj1983.03615995004700010033x
Subject(s) - hematite , goethite , oxisol , maghemite , crystallite , soil water , mineralogy , clay minerals , magnetite , chemistry , lepidocrocite , materials science , analytical chemistry (journal) , geology , crystallography , soil science , environmental chemistry , metallurgy , organic chemistry , adsorption
In the differential x‐ray diffraction (DXRD) method the diffraction pattern for iron minerals in a soil or clay sample is obtained by subtracting the pattern for a sample free of iron oxides, after appropriate adjustment of intensity, from that of an untreated sample. We modified this method by using 1 µm α‐alumina as an internal standard to calculate the scale factor for the adjustment of intensity. The internal standard also serves as a reference for making corrections in peak position. Alumina has the advantages that it is not attacked by the citrate‐bicarbonate‐dithionite (CBD) treatment to remove iron oxides and its peak positions do not overlap the broad diffraction peaks of Fe oxides in the range of 2 to 5 A ˙ . The effects of CBD treatment on soil components other than Fe oxides can also be observed. Iron minerals in 11 soils from Indiana and Goias State, Brazil, were characterized using this technique. Hematitegoethite ratios, mean crystallite dimension, and amount of Al substitution in the iron oxides were calculated from the position, height, and width at half‐height of the DXRD peaks. The redder soils had more extractable Fe and larger hematite‐goethite ratios than the yellower soils. The amount of Al substitution in goethite and hematite and the mean crystallite dimension of hematite was greater for the Oxisols of Brazil than the Alfisols of Indiana. Maghemite was detected in soil clay of a red Oxisol from Brazil.