Premium
Statistical Considerations for Evaluating Micronutrient Tests
Author(s) -
Keisling T. C.,
Mullinix Ben
Publication year - 1979
Publication title -
soil science society of america journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.836
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1435-0661
pISSN - 0361-5995
DOI - 10.2136/sssaj1979.03615995004300060025x
Subject(s) - micronutrient , statistics , test (biology) , mathematics , confidence interval , sample size determination , population , sample (material) , medicine , environmental health , biology , chemistry , pathology , chromatography , paleontology
For the purposes of making recommendations, micronutrient soil or tissue tests are basically classification procedures. The empirical test variable usually groups samples into three areas, i.e. a group containing mostly samples with no micronutrient problems, a second group containing mostly samples with the micronutrient problems, and a third group containing samples both with and without micronutrient problems. The third group described above can be thought of as occurring at a “transition zone” where the correct status of a sample is unidentifiable by the micronutrient test. Statistical methods using an interaction Chi‐Square are presented for identifying the boundaries of the “transition zone.” It is proposed that a micronutrient test be evaluated in terms of the proportion of successful recommendations. A successful recommendation results when the proper status of a sample is identified by the test. Under the assumption of random sampling from a stable population, the above evaluation scheme follows a binomial distribution. The computation of variances and confidence intervals is shown and discussed for the proportion of successful recommendations. A statistically valid method for comparing different empirical tests, such as extracting solutions, is shown and contrasted to previously used methods.