Premium
Influence of Surface Roughness and Clod Size and Stability on Soil and Water Losses
Author(s) -
Johnson C. B.,
Mannering J. V.,
Moldenhauer W. C.
Publication year - 1979
Publication title -
soil science society of america journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.836
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1435-0661
pISSN - 0361-5995
DOI - 10.2136/sssaj1979.03615995004300040031x
Subject(s) - loam , surface runoff , environmental science , soil water , infiltration (hvac) , tillage , soil science , soil texture , surface roughness , erosion , soil compaction , hydrology (agriculture) , geology , geotechnical engineering , agronomy , materials science , geomorphology , ecology , composite material , biology
Rough cloddy surfaces increased infiltration and decreased soil erosion compared to smoother surfaces as determined by simulated rainfall studies. Overtilling reduced surface roughness and cloddiness. One field experiment showed that a rough surface decreased runoff by 77% and soil erosion by 89% of that from a smooth surface. Tillage of wet soil increased surface roughness, but another field experiment showed that clods resulting from plowing the soil when wet were quite unstable compared with clods from plowing nearer the upper plastic limit. Tilling of compacted soil results in greater cloddiness than tilling of uncompacted soils. However, a laboratory experiment showed that compacted loam clods were less resistant to breakdown by water drop energy than those from uncompacted soil. Compaction of silty clay loam and silty clay soils did not change their stability significantly. To be effective as an erosion control measure, soil clods must be large enough and stable enough to keep infiltration at a high level until the crop canopy covers the soil surface. These studies describe the size and stability necessary to maintain a high level of runoff and erosion control.