Premium
Reactions of Ammonium Ortho‐ and Polyphosphate Fertilizers in Soil: I. Mobility of Phosphorus
Author(s) -
Khasawneh F. E.,
Sample E. C.,
Hashimoto Isao
Publication year - 1974
Publication title -
soil science society of america journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.836
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1435-0661
pISSN - 0361-5995
DOI - 10.2136/sssaj1974.03615995003800030022x
Subject(s) - polyphosphate , phosphorus , loam , ammonium polyphosphate , fertilizer , chemistry , water content , ammonium , diammonium phosphate , pyrophosphate , precipitation , moisture , environmental chemistry , agronomy , environmental science , phosphate , soil science , soil water , geology , raw material , biochemistry , physics , geotechnical engineering , organic chemistry , meteorology , enzyme , biology
The mobility of P applied as diammonium orthophosphate (DAP), triammonium pyrophosphate (TPP), or ammonium polyphosphate (APP) was studied in columns of Hartsells fine sandy loam. The fertilizer dissolved in soil moisture that moved towards the application site. This water movement was sometimes against a gradient in soil moisture content, but it was along a gradient in the total potential of soil water. The extent of P movement from all three sources was similar, but the distribution patterns were different. The extent of P movement was influenced more by the initial soil moisture content than by the source of P. A higher fraction of the added P was precipitated when the source was TPP or APP than when it was DAP. The ability of the polyphosphates to sequester soil Fe and Al did not prevent the precipitation of these phosphates nor did it make them more mobile than the orthophosphates. It only delayed the precipitation reaction to a degree that depended on the polyphosphate content of the fertilizer material.