Premium
Factors Important in the Calculation of Hydraulic Conductivity
Author(s) -
Kunze R. J.,
Uehara G.,
Graham K.
Publication year - 1968
Publication title -
soil science society of america journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.836
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1435-0661
pISSN - 0361-5995
DOI - 10.2136/sssaj1968.03615995003200060020x
Subject(s) - conductivity , hydraulic conductivity , moisture , hysteresis , computation , mathematics , water content , loop (graph theory) , thermodynamics , soil science , soil water , materials science , chemistry , physics , geotechnical engineering , environmental science , geology , condensed matter physics , composite material , algorithm , combinatorics
The calculation of hydraulic conductivity by a modified Millington‐Quirk method with a matching factor gave conductivity values closely approximating experimentally measured values. The technique requires knowledge of the moisture characteristic and the saturated conductivity. A number of factors that affect the calculated values and improve the computational results were investigated. Calculated conductivity values decreased with an increasing number of pressure classes at low moisture contents. For all soils tested the calculated conductivities were less than the experimental values at the terminal point of the moisture characteristic. This discrepancy was partially corrected by a small change in the Millington‐Quirk equation, by extending the moisture characteristics to higher suction values, and by reducing the number of pressure classes to approximately 10. A matching factor, the ratio of measured over calculated saturated conductivity, was found necessary for obtaining the best fit of calculated and measured data. Two conductivity functions calculated separately from each moisture characteristic forming a hysteresis loop, converged as the hysteresis loop was translated to higher tensions. All computations were done by computer.