Premium
Relative Erodibility of Three Loess‐Derived Soils in Southwestern Iowa
Author(s) -
Schmidt B. L.,
Shrader W. D.,
Moldenhauer W. C.
Publication year - 1964
Publication title -
soil science society of america journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.836
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1435-0661
pISSN - 0361-5995
DOI - 10.2136/sssaj1964.03615995002800040035x
Subject(s) - loess , soil water , infiltration (hvac) , erosion , soil science , soil loss , environmental science , geology , total organic carbon , hydrology (agriculture) , geomorphology , geotechnical engineering , environmental chemistry , chemistry , physics , thermodynamics
Measurements of original and present surface soil depth, as indicated by slope and erosion field data and organic carbon contents, were used to determine the relative erodibility of the loess‐derived Monona, Marshall, and Sharpsburg soils in southwestern Iowa. These studies indicated decreasing surface soil depths with increasing slope on all three soils, with the Monona soil having the least and Sharpsburg the most surface soil remaining. The difference in average depth to an arbitrary benchmark, 0.90% organic carbon content, in cultivated as compared with virgin profiles of each soil indicated, however, that slightly lower erosion losses due to cultivation over time have occurred on the Monona soil. Laboratory rainfall simulator studies indicated higher infiltration and lower soil loss rates on the Monona soil than on the Marshall and Sharpsburg soils. The formation of a dense surface seal by raindrop impact appeared to be a dominant factor in the erodibility of these soils. Studies on crusted samples indicated slightly lower soil loss and higher infiltration rates on the Monona even with the crust present.