Premium
Physical and Chemical Properties of Soil Aggregates in a Brunizem Soil
Author(s) -
Wittmuss H. D.,
Mazurak A. P.
Publication year - 1958
Publication title -
soil science society of america journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.836
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1435-0661
pISSN - 0361-5995
DOI - 10.2136/sssaj1958.03615995002200010001x
Subject(s) - wetting , loam , chemistry , moisture , saturation (graph theory) , water content , soil water , water retention , degree of saturation , mineralogy , soil science , materials science , geology , composite material , organic chemistry , geotechnical engineering , mathematics , combinatorics
A surface sample of Sharpsburg silty clay loam was separated into aggregate fractions of diameters 4760 to 2380µ, 2380 to 1190µ, + … +, 37 to 18.5µ by means of rotary sieves and elutriators. A similar separation was made for primary particles. Each fraction of aggregates was analyzed for chemical and physical properties. The physical properties of aggregates were compared with those of primary particles. Data on water stability of aggregates show that as the diameter of aggregates decreased the stability increased. Particularly, aggregates of diameter 74 to 37µ and 37 to 18.5µ were different from the other fractions. Some of the differences in properties were: higher degree of aggregation, percentage of primary particles, available phosphorus, and exchangeable Ca ++ ; lower moisture retention, percentage of organic matter, total nitrogen content, and exchangeable H + . At complete water saturation, aggregates and particles wetted under partial vacuum held greater amounts of water on a volume basis than did aggregates and particles wetted under atmospheric pressure. However, as tension was applied, more water was released from the aggregates and particles wetted under partial vacuum than under atmospheric pressure. At increased tensions, the differences between the two methods of wetting were less marked. At tensions of 0.33 atm. and higher, the moisture contents were nearly identical. Aggregates treated with VAMA soil additive, under both vacuum‐wetting and atmospheric‐wetting, released more water at successive tensions than did those without the additive.