z-logo
Premium
A Comparison of Methods for Determining Extractable Soil Potassium in Fertilizer Test Plots
Author(s) -
Salomon Milton,
Smith John B.
Publication year - 1957
Publication title -
soil science society of america journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.836
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1435-0661
pISSN - 0361-5995
DOI - 10.2136/sssaj1957.03615995002100020022x
Subject(s) - potash , loam , chemistry , potassium , ammonium acetate , amberlite , soil test , organic matter , extraction (chemistry) , ammonium sulfate , silt , fertilizer , soil water , environmental chemistry , soil science , environmental science , geology , chromatography , paleontology , organic chemistry , high performance liquid chromatography , adsorption
A Bridgehampton silt loam which had received various amounts of potassium fertilizers for 44 years was analyzed for extractable or exchangeable K by 6 methods. Total K and that removed by boiling 1 N HNO 3 were also determined. The methods measured significantly different quantities of K. The Peech‐English method extracted more than did the North Carolina, Maine, or Morgan procedures. Neutral normal ammonium acetate extraction and a method employing IR‐120 resin (Amberlite) were intermediate. The use of exchange resin, although too lengthy for rapid soil testing, appeared more effective in estimating crop response (mixed hay yields 1954–55) than did the buffered acetate solutions. The North Carolina acid extraction and the HNO 3 method for nonexchangeable K were least effective in this respect. Nonexchangeable K, although related to the exchangeable fraction K, was not significantly associated with the total applied, indicating that the shifting of exchangeable to less available forms of K was not cumulative and is probably a reflection of the very low clay content of this soil. However, greater residues of K were found in topsoils than in subsoils indicating a relationship with soil organic matter which constitutes most of the exchange material. Average recovery of K from muriate and sulfate applications was essentially the same. There was no accumulation of extractable K in spring samples where less than 80 pounds of potash had been applied in the preceding fall.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here