Premium
Growth, Herbage Accumulation, and Nutritive Value of ‘Tifton 85’ Bermudagrass as Affected by Nitrogen Fertilization Strategies
Author(s) -
Borges Bernardo M. M. N.,
Silveira Maria L.,
Cardoso Saulo S.,
Moline Ederlon F. V.,
Coutinho Neto Andre M.,
Lucas Fabio T.,
Muraoka Takashi,
Coutinho Edson L. M.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
crop science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.76
H-Index - 147
eISSN - 1435-0653
pISSN - 0011-183X
DOI - 10.2135/cropsci2016.10.0890
Subject(s) - tifton , cynodon dactylon , agronomy , forage , human fertilization , cynodon , biology , fertilizer , shoot , leaf area index , urea , ammonium nitrate , nitrogen , nitrate , photosynthetically active radiation , zoology , botany , chemistry , photosynthesis , ecology , biochemistry , organic chemistry
Nitrogen fertilization affects ‘Tifton 85’ bermudagrass ( Cynodon spp.) herbage accumulation (HA) and nutritive value; however, forage response may be affected by N fertilizer source, application levels, and environmental conditions. This 2‐yr study evaluated the effect of different N fertilization strategies on Tifton 85 bermudagrass responses in a tropical soil from southeast Brazil. Treatments were two N sources (ammonium nitrate [AN] and urea) applied at 0, 60, 120, 180, and 240 kg N ha −1 harvest −1 . Fertilizer sources were enriched with 15 N to quantify the recovery of fertilizer‐derived N. Forage was harvested at 30‐d intervals to evaluate HA and shoot N concentration. Leaf area index (LAI), intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (PARi), and chlorophyll index were measured 1 d before harvest. Ammonium nitrate and urea resulted in similar Tifton 85 HA. Maximum Tifton 85 HA (4.6 Mg ha −1 ) was reached at the fertilization level of 210 kg N ha −1 harvest −1 while critical shoot N concentration, herein defined at 90% relative production, was 23.7 g kg −1 . Similarly, critical PARi and LAI were 71% and 4.7 m 2 m −2 , respectively. Nitrogen recovery in the plant and soil was greater for urea (52%) than AN (41%). Despite the relatively greater shoot N accumulation, N recovery decreased as N levels increased. Nitrogen application level should be adjusted to optimize HA, nutritive value, and N recovery.