Premium
Corn and Soybean Yield Response to Tillage, Rotation, and Nematicide Seed Treatment
Author(s) -
Mourtzinis Spyridon,
Marburger David,
Gaska John,
Diallo Thierno,
Lauer Joe,
Conley Shawn
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
crop science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.76
H-Index - 147
eISSN - 1435-0653
pISSN - 0011-183X
DOI - 10.2135/cropsci2016.09.0792
Subject(s) - agronomy , tillage , biology , crop rotation , cropping system , rotation system , yield (engineering) , crop , conventional tillage , chemistry , nitrogen , materials science , metallurgy , organic chemistry
Corn ( Zea mays L.) and soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] rotations are common production systems across the midwestern United States. However, the interactive effect of crop rotation, tillage, and nematicide seed treatments on the yield of both crops in the rotation system is not well understood. Field trials were conducted in a long‐term crop rotation experiment during 2013 to 2015 to measure yield response of both corn and soybean to three factors: (i) tillage system (no‐till [NT] and conventional), (ii) crop rotation frequency (14 sequences involving corn and soybean), and (iii) three nematicide seed treatments (a control, abamectin/ Pasteuria nishizawae , and Bacillus firmus ). Rotations that involved consecutive years of soybean exhibited the greatest nematode populations in the soil, whereas, consecutive years of corn resulted in lower nematode populations. No significant differences in nematode populations were observed among the other examined management practices. Conventional tillage resulted in up to 18% greater corn and 10% greater soybean yield than NT. Yearly crop rotation increased corn yield by 20% and soybean yield by 22% compared with continuous cropping. Seed treatment nematicides had no effect on corn and soybean yield. The production system that involved yearly rotation of corn and soybean, regardless of tillage system and nematicide seed treatment, exhibited the greatest yield potential during the 3 yr of this study. Such rotation system using NT can be an attractive option for farmers in this region, since NT has reduced field operations and labor requirements.