z-logo
Premium
Nitrate and Ammonium Leaching in Cool‐Season Turfgrass as Affected by Temperature and Potential Evapotranspiration
Author(s) -
Soldat Douglas J.,
Petrovic A. Martin,
Rossi Frank S.,
Barlow Jeffrey
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
crop science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.76
H-Index - 147
eISSN - 1435-0653
pISSN - 0011-183X
DOI - 10.2135/cropsci2016.09.0780
Subject(s) - leaching (pedology) , poa pratensis , agronomy , lysimeter , ammonium , festuca arundinacea , temperate climate , fertilizer , leachate , nitrate , nitrogen , loam , growing season , evapotranspiration , festuca rubra , environmental science , chemistry , poaceae , biology , soil water , environmental chemistry , botany , ecology , organic chemistry
Nitrogen (N) fertilizer is often added to turfgrass during times of low temperature when soil N mineralization cannot meet plant needs. However, the spring and fall in humid temperate regions often receive more precipitation than evapotranspiration (ET). Excess soluble N in the soil has the potential to be leached into groundwater, especially when groundwater is being recharged. Temperature and ET are hypothesized to influence N uptake independently; however, their individual contributions have not been characterized in turfgrass systems. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate ammonium (NH 4 –N) and nitrate (NO 3 –N) leaching of applied fertilizer from different cool‐season grasses under a wide range of temperature and potential ET conditions observed in the cooler periods of the year in temperate climates. Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis L.) and a mixture of tall fescue [ Schedonorus arundinaceus (Schreb.) Dumort.] and fine fescue ( Festuca longifolia Tracey) were established in 36‐cm‐deep containers on a sandy loam soil. The treatments were combinations of six temperatures (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10°C) and three potential ET rates (1.0, 2.5, and 5.1 mm d −1 ). Approximately 10 d after a 49‐kg ha −1 application of soluble N, leaching was induced. As temperature and ET decreased (independently), more NO 3 –N was recovered in leachate. Ammonium leaching was low and not affected by any factor. ET had a larger influence on NO 3 –N leaching at higher temperatures than at lower temperatures. These results suggest that both forecasted temperature and ET could be useful for developing NO 3 –N leaching risk assessment models.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here