z-logo
Premium
Using the Solvent Retention Capacity Test When Breeding Wheat for Diverse Production Environments
Author(s) -
Walker Carl,
Campbell Kimberly Garland,
Carter Brady,
Kidwell Kimberlee
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
crop science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.76
H-Index - 147
eISSN - 1435-0653
pISSN - 0011-183X
DOI - 10.2135/cropsci2007.06.0348
Subject(s) - biology , repeatability , zoology , food science , microbiology and biotechnology , statistics , mathematics
The solvent retention capacity (SRC) test is used to predict commercial baking performance of soft wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) by measuring the capacity of flour to retain each of four solvents—water, Na 2 CO 3 , sucrose, and lactic acid—to assess overall absorption capacity, starch damage, pentosan and gliadin content, and glutenin quality, respectively. Our objectives were to determine sources of variation in the test, repeatability, and optimum scale and resource allocation needed to maximize efficiency. Duplicate SRC tests were conducted for each solvent using two flour sample sizes (5 and 0.2 g) from two field replications of each of 8 soft white spring and 16 soft white winter genotypes grown in five and three environments, respectively. We conducted ANOVAs and used variance components to assess the consistency with which genotypic differences were detected. The interactions of genotype × environment and genotype × field replication within environment were significant ( P < 0.05) for most solvent and sample weight combinations. Repeatability values were high and consistent for all solvents (0.86–0.96) when 5‐g samples were used, indicating that selection based on any solvent should result in gains from selection at this scale. Only lactic acid and sucrose were accurately predictive at the 0.2‐g scale, limiting its utility. Repeatability values improved with increased numbers of environments, field replications, or laboratory replications; however, this may be cost prohibitive when evaluating early‐generation breeding material on a large scale, especially since the magnitude of increase in predictability diminished with each additional unit.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here