Premium
Identification of Essentially Derived Varieties Obtained from Biparental Crosses of Homozygous Lines: I. Simple Sequence Repeat Data from Maize Inbreds
Author(s) -
Heckenberger M.,
Bohn M.,
Melchinger A. E.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
crop science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.76
H-Index - 147
eISSN - 1435-0653
pISSN - 0011-183X
DOI - 10.2135/cropsci2004.0110
Subject(s) - biology , backcrossing , genetics , inbred strain , genetic variation , zea mays , agronomy , gene
Genetic distances (GDs) based on molecular markers such as simple sequence repeats (SSRs) have been proposed as an appropriate tool to assess the genetic conformity between putative essentially derived varieties (EDVs) and their initial varieties (IVs). However, for maize ( Zea mays L.) and other crops, no consensus has been reached regarding GD thresholds for identification of EDVs, mainly because reliable benchmark data are lacking. Our objectives were to (i) determine the variation in the parental contribution ( p ) to the genome of homozygous progeny lines derived in recycling breeding programs; (ii) investigate the power of SSR‐based GD estimates for discriminating between progeny lines derived from F 2 , BC 1 , and BC 2 populations (BC = backcross); (iii) compare theoretical and simulated results of a companion study to our experimental data; and (iv) draw conclusions with regard to various EDV thresholds suggested hitherto. A total of 220 European and U.S. maize inbred lines comprising 163 triplets were genotyped with 100 uniformly distributed SSRs. A triplet consisted of one F 2 –, or BC 1 –derived progeny line and both parental lines. The SSR‐based estimates of p varied from 0.25 to 0.74 for F 2 –derived lines with a mean (0.49) close to the expectation (0.50), and ranged from 0.51 to 0.80 for BC 1 –derived lines with a mean (0.66) significantly smaller than the expectation (0.75). Relative to the variation in p , the GD between progeny lines and parents was little influenced by the variation in the GD between the parents, particularly for BC 1 –derived lines. Suggested GD thresholds for EDVs resulted in different Type I (α) and Type II (β) errors, depending on the germplasm pool. Considerable overlaps in the GD frequency distributions of F 2 –, BC 1 –, and BC 2 –derived lines indicate that the resolution to discriminate these types of progeny is poor unless a much larger number or a set of extremely polymorphic markers is used.