Premium
Phenotypic Alterations and Crop Maturity Differences in Ultra‐Narrow Row and Conventionally Spaced Cotton
Author(s) -
Jost Philip H.,
Cothren J. Tom
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
crop science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.76
H-Index - 147
eISSN - 1435-0653
pISSN - 0011-183X
DOI - 10.2135/cropsci2001.4141150x
Subject(s) - loam , gossypium hirsutum , biology , row crop , crop , row , field experiment , malvaceae , agronomy , fiber crop , yield (engineering) , horticulture , mathematics , soil water , physics , agriculture , ecology , database , computer science , thermodynamics
Ultra‐narrow row cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) production is considered a potential strategy for reducing production costs by shortening the growing season. A 2‐yr field study was conducted near College Station, TX, on varying soil types to document phenotypic alterations and crop maturity differences for cotton grown in 19‐, 38‐, 76‐, and 101‐cm row spacings. In the 19‐cm rows, the plant densities were 12.2, 18.8, and 40.5 plants m −2 Densities of 11.3 and 19.5 plants m −2 were established in the 38‐cm rows. In the 76‐ and 101‐cm rows, plant densities of 11.7 and 7.4 plants m −2 , respectively, were evaluated. Plant height and node counts were reduced in the narrow (19 and 38 cm) row spacings in only 1 yr. The narrow row spacings at the higher plant densities consistently accumulated leaf area index more rapidly than the conventional (76 and 101 cm) row spacings. In 1998, when the study was conducted on a heavy clay soil, the higher plant densities in the 19‐ and 38‐cm row spacings tended to partition more biomass to reproductive structures and yielded more than the conventional row spacings. In 1999, the test was conducted on a lighter silty clay loam soil and yields were unaffected by the row‐spacing treatments. In 1998, the higher plant densities in the 19‐ and 38‐cm row spacings had a greater percentage of harvestable bolls at the first fruiting positions on lower nodes, a boll distribution pattern that contributed to earlier crop maturity. Narrow row spacings and high plant densities did not consistently alter fiber quality. No conclusive differences for crop growth and development could be ascertained between the medium and high plant densities in the 19‐ and 38‐cm row spacings. However, ultra‐narrow row cotton may be more advantageous to producers when grown on heavier soils that typically do not promote excessive vegetative growth.