z-logo
Premium
Dry Matter Allocation and Fruiting Patterns of Cotton Grown at Two Divergent Plant Populations
Author(s) -
Jones Michael A.,
Wells Randy
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
crop science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.76
H-Index - 147
eISSN - 1435-0653
pISSN - 0011-183X
DOI - 10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183x003700030017x
Subject(s) - biology , seedling , malvaceae , loam , population , germination , dry matter , vegetative reproduction , agronomy , crop , fiber crop , phenology , horticulture , botany , soil water , ecology , demography , sociology
Reduced plant populations frequently occur in the northern Cotton Belt of the USA because of poor seed germination and early seedling damage. A field study was conducted at Clayton, NC, on a Dothan sandy loam (fine‐loamy, siliceous, thermic Plinthic Paleudult) to investigate the response of cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) vegetative and reproductive development to two plant populations. Cotton plants, grown at 2 and 12 plants m −2 in 1.0‐m rows had every flower tagged with week‐specific, color‐coded tags. Dry matter partitioning, flower development, flower retention, and boll development patterns were determined. Plants at the low population exhibited large increases in the vegetative dry weight of individual plants at maturity; however, all parameters of vegetative growth were reduced on a land area basis. Reproductive development of the 2 plants m −2 treatment was prolonged because of fewer early fruiting sites per unit land area and there was an average 16‐d delay in flowering maxima. No differences in total flowers per meter or flower retention occurred between treatments at final harvest. Slight differences in total bolls per meter occurred in 1993 (13% fewer bolls at 2 plants m −2 ); however, the low population plants had more bolls on monopodia, more late‐season flowers, and greater retention of these late bolls. Replanting low populations would not be advisable because the delay in maturity would probably be more injurious to boll production than the low population per se.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here