Premium
Heritability and Relationship to Yield of Excised‐Leaf Water Retention in Durum Wheat 1
Author(s) -
Clarke John M.,
TownleySmith T. Fred
Publication year - 1986
Publication title -
crop science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.76
H-Index - 147
eISSN - 1435-0653
pISSN - 0011-183X
DOI - 10.2135/cropsci1986.0011183x002600020016x
Subject(s) - heritability , biology , yield (engineering) , triticum turgidum , water stress , drought stress , water use efficiency , horticulture , water retention , poaceae , agronomy , zoology , soil water , irrigation , ecology , genetics , materials science , metallurgy
Previous research indicated that excised‐leaf water retention capability was related to drought resistance in Triticum spp., but no information is available on the heritability of the trait or its relationship to yield under drought conditions. The heritability and relationship to yield of excised‐leaf water retention capability was studied in eight durum wheat( T. turgidum L. var. durum )crosses involving the high retention parent ‘Pelissier’. Fifty random lines from each cross were studied under field conditions in the F 4 ,F 8 and F 8 generations. Standard‐unit heritabilities of initial and initial minus wilted leaf water concentration were calculated by regressing F 4 on F 6 , and F 6 on F 8 values. Heritability of initial leaf water concentration ranged from 0.08 to 0.61 in the F 4 /F 6 , and from 0.15 to 0.41 in the F 6 /F 8 comparisons. Heritability of initial minus wilted water concentration ranged from 0.11 to 0.49 in the F 4 /F 6 comparisons, and from 0.10 to 0.38 in the F 6 /F 8 . Simple correlations between yield and initial minus wilted leaf water concentration tended to be low and nonsignificant. Comparisons of the yields of the 10 fastest and 10 slowest water losers within crosses and years, however, showed significant differences in all but three of 20 cases. In two of the crosses, water retention was yield‐negative in low drought stress environments, but yield‐positive in a high‐stress environment. Retention capability tended to be yield‐positive or yield‐neutral in the other crosses regardless of environment. Further studies, using a broader range of genetics sources of high water retention, are required in order to develop suitable selection strategies for the retention trait.