Premium
An Evaluation of Estimators of Location for Maize Yield Comparisons 1
Author(s) -
Openshaw S. J.
Publication year - 1985
Publication title -
crop science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.76
H-Index - 147
eISSN - 1435-0653
pISSN - 0011-183X
DOI - 10.2135/cropsci1985.0011183x002500060009x
Subject(s) - estimator , statistics , mathematics , mean squared error , efficiency , truncated mean , biology , zea mays , rank (graph theory) , yield (engineering) , combinatorics , agronomy , materials science , metallurgy
The arithmetic mean's performance as an estimator is well regarded under optimal circumstances, but has received criticism as being nonrobust under less than ideal conditions. This study evaluated how well eight estimators of location performed in comparing maize ( Zea mays L.) hybrid yield performance at early stages of testing. Data from five hybrids grown together in 123 tests were taken from commercial yield trials in 1981 and 1982. Eight statistics based on five trials were used to estimate four orthogonal comparisons of hybrid yields and were evaluated for their ability to predict mean differences based upon 118 other trials. The arithmetic mean, the 10% trimmed mean, and a rank‐order weighted mean were the best estimators in the study. The 20% trimmed mean, an adaptive estimator, Huber P15, and a squared deviation weighted mean performed almost as well as the three best statistics. The median was the worst estimator. This study supports the use of the mean, compared with the other seven estimators investigated, for comparing maize hybrid yields at early stages of testing.