Premium
Selection for Yield and Yield Components in Wheat 1
Author(s) -
McNeal F. H.,
Qualset C. O.,
Baldridge D. E.,
Stewart V. R.
Publication year - 1978
Publication title -
crop science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.76
H-Index - 147
eISSN - 1435-0653
pISSN - 0011-183X
DOI - 10.2135/cropsci1978.0011183x001800050027x
Subject(s) - selection (genetic algorithm) , biology , kernel (algebra) , grain yield , yield (engineering) , population , statistics , spike (software development) , agronomy , botany , mathematics , horticulture , zoology , combinatorics , machine learning , demography , materials science , management , sociology , computer science , economics , metallurgy
From an F 2 population of about 700 plants from across of two spring wheats ( Triticum aestivum L.) CI 13242 and ‘Thatcher,’ 10 plants were selected for maximum expression of grain yield per plant, spike number/plant, kernel number/spike, spikelet number/spike, and kernel weight. In each subsequent generation through the F 8 , selection lines for each of the five characters were advanced by selecting the 10 plants with the highest value from a population of about 400 plants. A performance trial was conducted at three locations in 1 year with five generations (F 4 to F 8 ) of each of the five selection lines and the two parents. Yield and yield components were evaluated and compared with midparent values and as linear regressions on generation number. Selection for kernel weight and kernels/spike at the F 8 generation gave 11 and 16% increases in yield over the midparent, whereas direct effects of selection for these two characteristics were 13 and 10%, respectively. Direct effects of selection for grain yield and spikes/m 2 at the F 8 generation were significantly lower than the midparent (—13 and —7%). Nonsymmetrical correlated responses for increased kernel weight with selection for high kernel number and for decreased kernel number with selection for high kernel weight were large and unexpected. Spike number per plant was not an effective selection criterion for increasing spike number per m 2 or grain yield. Only 3 of 20 regression coefficients for response in the F 4 through F 8 generations were significant, compared with 15 of 20 significant differences from the midparent at F 8 . Apparently selection was effective in the F 2 and F 3 generations (13 of 20 midparent differences were significant at F 4 ), with little subsequent response. In this population, kernel weight and kernel number per spike were good characters for indirect selection for yield improvement.