Premium
An Integrated Landscape Designed for Commodity and Bioenergy Crops for a Tile‐Drained Agricultural Watershed
Author(s) -
Ssegane Herbert,
Negri M. Cristina
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of environmental quality
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.888
H-Index - 171
eISSN - 1537-2537
pISSN - 0047-2425
DOI - 10.2134/jeq2015.10.0518
Subject(s) - environmental science , marginal land , bioenergy , watershed , arable land , agricultural land , agriculture , willow , agroforestry , biofuel , ecology , machine learning , computer science , biology
Locating bioenergy crops on strategically selected subfield areas of marginal interest for commodity agriculture can increase environmental sustainability. Location and choice of bioenergy crops should improve environmental benefits with minimal disruption of current food production systems. We identified subfield soils of a tile‐drained agricultural watershed as marginal if they had areas of low crop productivity index (CPI), were susceptible to nitrate‐nitrogen (NO 3 –N) leaching, or were susceptible to at least two other forms of environmental degradation (marginal areas). In the test watershed (Indian Creek watershed, IL) with annual precipitation of 852 mm, 3% of soils were CPI areas and 22% were marginal areas. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool was used to forecast the impact of growing switchgrass ( Panicum virgatum L.), willow ( Salix spp.), and big bluestem ( Andropogon gerardi Vitman) in these subfield areas on annual grain yields, NO 3 –N and sediment exports, and water yield. Simulated conversion of CPI areas from current land use to bioenergy crops had no significant ( p ≤ 0.05) impact on grain production and reduced NO 3 –N and sediment exports by 5.0 to 6.0% and 3.0%, respectively. Conversion of marginal areas from current land use to switchgrass forecasted the production of 34,000 t of biomass and reductions in NO 3 –N (26.0%) and sediment (33.0%) exports. Alternatively, conversion of marginal areas from current land use to willow forecasted similar reductions as switchgrass for sediment but significantly ( p ≤ 0.01) lower reductions in annual NO 3 –N export (18.0 vs. 26.0%). Core Ideas We classified subproductive soils or soils vulnerable to environmental degradation as marginal. We forecasted the biomass potential of soils and associated water quality benefits. Conversion of soils of lowest CPI to energy crops had no impact on NO 3 –N export. Targeted conversion of 22% of the watershed to energy crops reduced nutrient export. Largest environmental benefits were from converting environmentally vulnerable land.