Premium
Nitrous Oxide Emission from Cropland and Adjacent Riparian Buffers in Contrasting Hydrogeomorphic Settings
Author(s) -
Fisher K.,
Jacinthe P. A.,
Vidon P.,
Liu X.,
Baker M. E.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of environmental quality
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.888
H-Index - 171
eISSN - 1537-2537
pISSN - 0047-2425
DOI - 10.2134/jeq2013.06.0223
Subject(s) - riparian zone , riparian buffer , environmental science , hydrology (agriculture) , riparian forest , agronomy , ecology , geology , geotechnical engineering , habitat , biology
Riparian buffers are important nitrate (NO 3 − ) sinks in agricultural watersheds, but limited information is available regarding the intensity and control of nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emission from these buffers. This study monitored (December 2009–May 2011) N 2 O fluxes at two agricultural riparian buffers in the White River watershed in Indiana to assess the impact of land use and hydrogeomorphologic (HGM) attributes on emission. The study sites included a riparian forest in a glacial outwash/alluvium setting (White River [WR]) and a grassed riparian buffer in tile‐drained till plains (Leary Weber Ditch [LWD]). Adjacent corn ( Zea mays L.) fields were monitored for land use assessment. Analysis of variance identified season, land use (riparian buffer vs. crop field), and site geomorphology as major drivers of N 2 O fluxes. Strong relationships between N mineralization and N 2 O fluxes were found at both sites, but relationships with other nutrient cycling indicators (C/N ratio, dissolved organic C, microbial biomass C) were detected only at LWD. Nitrous oxide emission showed strong seasonal variability; the largest N 2 O peaks occurred in late spring/early summer as a result of flooding at the WR riparian buffer (up to 27.8 mg N 2 O–N m −2 d −1 ) and N fertilizer application to crop fields. Annual N 2 O emission (kg N 2 O–N ha −1 ) was higher in the crop fields (WR: 7.82; LWD: 6.37) than in the riparian areas. A significant difference ( P < 0.02) in annual N 2 O emission between the riparian buffers was detected (4.32 vs. 1.03 kg N 2 O–N ha −1 at WR and LWD, respectively), and this difference was attributed to site geomorphology and flooding (WR is flood prone; no flooding occurred at tile‐drained LWD). The study results demonstrate the significance of landscape geomorphology and land–stream connection (i.e., flood potential) as drivers of N 2 O emission in riparian buffers and therefore argue that an HGM‐based approach should be especially suitable for determination of regional N 2 O budget in riparian ecosystems.