z-logo
Premium
Soil Fate of Agricultural Fumigants in Raised‐Bed, Plasticulture Systems in the Southeastern United States
Author(s) -
Chellemi Dan O.,
Ajwa Husein A.,
Sullivan David A.,
Alessandro Rocco,
Gilreath James P.,
Yates Scott R.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
journal of environmental quality
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.888
H-Index - 171
eISSN - 1537-2537
pISSN - 0047-2425
DOI - 10.2134/jeq2010.0494
Subject(s) - environmental science , agriculture , forestry , hydrology (agriculture) , environmental protection , water resource management , geography , archaeology , engineering , geotechnical engineering
Soil concentrations and degradation rates of methyl isothio‐cyanate (MITC), chloropicrin (CP), 1,3‐dichloropropene (1,3‐D), and dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) were determined under fumigant application scenarios representative of commercial raised bed, plastic mulched vegetable production systems. Five days after application, 1,3‐D, MITC, and CP were detected at concentrations up to 3.52, 0.72, and 2.45 μg cm −3 , respectively, in the soil atmosphere when applications were made in uniformly compacted soils with a water content >200% of field capacity and covered by a virtually impermeable or metalized film. By contrast, DMDS, MITC, and CP concentrations in the soil atmosphere were 0.81, 0.02, and 0.05 μg cm −3 , respectively, 5 d after application in soil containing undecomposed plant residue, numerous large (>3 mm) clods, and water content below field capacity and covered by low‐density polyethylene. Ranked in order of impact on the persistence of fumigants in soil were soil water content (moisture), soil tilth (the physical condition of soil as related to its fitness as a planting bed), the type of plastic film used to cover fumigated beds, and soil texture. Fumigants were readily detected 13 d after application when applied in uniformly compacted soils with water contents >200% of capacity and covered by a virtually impermeable or metalized film. By contrast, 1,3‐D and MITC had dissipated 5 d after application in soils with numerous large (>3 mm) clods and water contents below field capacity that were covered by low‐density polyethylene. Soil degradation of CP, DMDS, and MITC were primarily attributed to biological mechanisms, whereas degradation of 1,3‐D was attributed principally to abiotic factors. This study demonstrates improved soil retention of agricultural fumigants in application scenarios representative of good agricultural practices.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here