z-logo
Premium
Phosphorus Runoff Losses from Subsurface‐Applied Poultry Litter on Coastal Plain Soils
Author(s) -
Kibet Leonard C.,
Allen Arthur L.,
Kleinman Peter J. A.,
Feyereisen Gary W.,
Church Clinton,
Saporito Lou S.,
Way Thomas R.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
journal of environmental quality
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.888
H-Index - 171
eISSN - 1537-2537
pISSN - 0047-2425
DOI - 10.2134/jeq2010.0161
Subject(s) - surface runoff , litter , environmental science , poultry litter , tillage , subsurface flow , hydrology (agriculture) , soil water , eutrophication , lysimeter , water quality , zoology , agronomy , groundwater , soil science , nutrient , ecology , geology , biology , geotechnical engineering
The application of poultry litter to soils is a water quality concern on the Delmarva Peninsula, as runoff contributes P to the eutrophic Chesapeake Bay. This study compared a new subsurface applicator for poultry litter with conventional surface application and tillage incorporation of litter on a Coastal Plain soil under no‐till management. Monolith lysimeters (61 cm by 61 cm by 61 cm) were collected immediately after litter application and subjected to rainfall simulation (61 mm h −1 , 1 h) 15 and 42 d later. In the first rainfall event, subsurface application of litter significantly lowered total P losses in runoff (1.90 kg ha −1 ) compared with surface application (4.78 kg ha −1 ). Losses of P with subsurface application were not significantly different from disked litter or an unamended control. By the second event, total P losses did not differ significantly between surface and subsurface litter treatments but were at least twofold greater than losses from the disked and control treatments. A rising water table in the second event likely mobilized dissolved forms of P in subsurface‐applied litter to the soil surface, enriching runoff water with P. Across both events, subsurface application of litter did not significantly decrease cumulative losses of P relative to surface‐applied litter, whereas disking the litter into the soil did. Results confirm the short‐term reduction of runoff P losses with subsurface litter application observed elsewhere but highlight the modifying effect of soil hydrology on this technology's ability to minimize P loss in runoff.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom