z-logo
Premium
Whole‐Stream Response to Nitrate Loading in Three Streams Draining Agricultural Landscapes
Author(s) -
Duff John H.,
Tesoriero Anthony J.,
Richardson William B.,
Strauss Eric A.,
Munn Mark D.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
journal of environmental quality
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.888
H-Index - 171
eISSN - 1537-2537
pISSN - 0047-2425
DOI - 10.2134/jeq2007.0187
Subject(s) - denitrification , environmental science , nitrate , benthic zone , nitrification , hydrology (agriculture) , environmental chemistry , soil water , surface water , chemistry , nitrogen , environmental engineering , ecology , soil science , geology , geotechnical engineering , organic chemistry , biology
Physical, chemical, hydrologic, and biologic factors affecting nitrate (NO 3 − ) removal were evaluated in three agricultural streams draining orchard/dairy and row crop settings. Using 3‐d “snapshots” during biotically active periods, we estimated reach‐level NO 3 − sources, NO 3 − mass balance, in‐stream processing (nitrification, denitrification, and NO 3 − uptake), and NO 3 − retention potential associated with surface water transport and ground water discharge. Ground water contributed 5 to 11% to stream discharge along the study reaches and 8 to 42% of gross NO 3 − input. Streambed processes potentially reduced 45 to 75% of ground water NO 3 − before discharge to surface water. In all streams, transient storage was of little importance for surface water NO 3 − retention. Estimated nitrification (1.6–4.4 mg N m −2 h −1 ) and unamended denitrification rates (2.0–16.3 mg N m −2 h −1 ) in sediment slurries were high relative to pristine streams. Denitrification of NO 3 − was largely independent of nitrification because both stream and ground water were sources of NO 3 − Unamended denitrification rates extrapolated to the reach‐scale accounted for <5% of NO 3 − exported from the reaches minimally reducing downstream loads. Nitrate retention as a percentage of gross NO 3 − inputs was >30% in an organic‐poor, autotrophic stream with the lowest denitrification potentials and highest benthic chlorophyll a , photosynthesis/respiration ratio, pH, dissolved oxygen, and diurnal NO 3 − variation. Biotic processing potentially removed 75% of ground water NO 3 − at this site, suggesting an important role for photosynthetic assimilation of ground water NO 3 − relative to subsurface denitrification as water passed directly through benthic diatom beds.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom