Premium
Land Application of Carbonatic Lake‐Dredged Materials
Author(s) -
Sigua Gilbert C.,
Coleman Samuel W.,
Holtkamp Mike L.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
journal of environmental quality
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.888
H-Index - 171
eISSN - 1537-2537
pISSN - 0047-2425
DOI - 10.2134/jeq2006.0060
Subject(s) - paspalum notatum , environmental science , soil water , entisol , pasture , soil quality , beef cattle , forage , agronomy , zoology , soil science , biology
The ability to reuse carbonatic lake‐dredged materials (CLDM) for agricultural purposes is important because it reduces offshore disposal and provides an alternative to disposal of the materials in landfills that are already overtaxed. A four‐year (2001 to 2005) study on land application of CLDM as an option for disposal was conducted on a beef cattle pasture in south central Florida. The objectives of this study were (i) to assess CLDM as a soil amendment to improve quality of sandy soils in most subtropical beef cattle pastures and (ii) to determine the effect of CLDM on productivity and nutritive values of bahiagrass (BG, Paspalum notatum Flügge) in subtropical beef cattle pasture. The five treatment combinations arranged in randomized complete block design were represented by plots with different ratios (R) of natural soil (NS) to CLDM: R1 (1000 g kg −1 :0 g kg −1 ); R2 (750 g kg −1 :250 g kg −1 ); R3 (500 g kg −1 :500 g kg −1 ); R4 (250 g kg −1 :750 g kg −1 ); and R5 (0 g kg −1 :1000 g kg −1 ). Addition of CLDM had significant ( p ≤ 0.001) effects on soil quality and favorable influence on forage establishment and nutritive values. Compared with the control plots (0 g kg −1 ), the soils in plots amended with CLDM exhibited (i) lower penetration resistance, (ii) an increase in soil pH and exchangeable cations (Ca and Mg), and (iii) decrease in the levels of soil trace metals (Mn, Cu, Fe, Zn, and Si). Results disclosed consistently and significantly ( p ≤ 0.001) higher BG biomass production (forage yield = −106.3x 2 + 1015.8x − 39.2; R 2 = 0.99**) and crude protein content (CP = 1.24x + 6.48; R 2 = 0.94**) from plots amended with CLDM than those of BG planted on plots with no CLDM treatment.