Premium
Agricultural Practices Influence Flow Regimes of Headwater Streams in Western Iowa
Author(s) -
Tomer M. D.,
Meek D. W.,
Kramer L. A.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
journal of environmental quality
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.888
H-Index - 171
eISSN - 1537-2537
pISSN - 0047-2425
DOI - 10.2134/jeq2004.0199
Subject(s) - streams , environmental science , agriculture , hydrology (agriculture) , flow (mathematics) , stream flow , geography , water resource management , archaeology , geology , drainage basin , mathematics , geotechnical engineering , cartography , computer science , computer network , geometry
Agricultural tillage influences runoff and infiltration, but consequent effects on watershed hydrology are poorly documented. This study evaluated 25 yr (1971–1995) hydrologic records from four first‐order watersheds in Iowa's loess hills. Two watersheds were under conventional tillage and two were under conservation (ridge) tillage, one of which was terraced. All four watersheds grew corn ( Zea mays L.) every year. Flow‐frequency statistics and autoregressive modeling were used to determine how conservation treatments influenced stream hydrology. The autoregressive modeling characterized variations in discharge, baseflow, and runoff at multi‐year, annual, and shorter time scales. The ridge‐tilled watershed (nonterraced) had 47% less runoff and 36% more baseflow than the conventional watershed of similar landform and slope. Recovery of baseflow after drought was quicker in the conservation watersheds, as evidenced by 365‐d moving average plots, and 67% greater baseflow during the driest 2 yr. The two conventional watersheds were similar, except the steeper watershed discharged more runoff and baseflow during short (<30 d), wet periods. Significant multi‐year and annual cycles occurred in all variables. Under ridge‐till, seasonal (annual‐cycle) variations in baseflow had greater amplitude, showing the seasonality of subsurface contaminant movement could increase under conservation practices. However, deviations from the modeled cycles of baseflow were also more persistent under conservation practices, indicating baseflow was more stable. Indeed, flow‐frequency curves showed wet‐weather discharge decreased and dry‐weather discharge increased under conservation practices. Although mean discharge increased in the conservation watersheds, variance and skewness of daily values were smaller. Ridge tillage with or without terraces increased stream discharge but reduced its variability.