Premium
Fate and Efficacy of Polyacrylamide Applied in Furrow Irrigation
Author(s) -
Lentz Rodrick D.,
Sojka Robert E.,
Mackey Bruce E.
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
journal of environmental quality
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.888
H-Index - 171
eISSN - 1537-2537
pISSN - 0047-2425
DOI - 10.2134/jeq2002.6610
Subject(s) - polyacrylamide , loam , surface runoff , hydrology (agriculture) , surface irrigation , ditch , irrigation , environmental science , tributary , sediment , soil water , chemistry , agronomy , soil science , geology , biology , ecology , paleontology , geotechnical engineering , cartography , polymer chemistry , geography
Polyacrylamide (PAM) is applied to 4 irrigated hectares annually in the USA to control irrigation‐induced erosion, yet the fate of dissolved PAM applied in irrigation water is not well documented. We determined the fate of PAM added to furrow streams under two treatments: Initial‐10 , 10 mg L −1 PAM product applied only during the initial hours of the irrigation, and Cont‐1 , 1.0 mg L −1 PAM product applied continuously during the entire irrigation. The study measured PAM concentrations in 167‐m‐long PAM‐treated furrow streams and along a 530‐m tail ditch that received this runoff. Soil was Portneuf silt loam (coarse‐silty, mixed, superactive, mesic Durinodic Xeric Haplocalcid) with 1.5% slope. Samples were taken at three times during the irrigations, both during and after PAM application. Polyacrylamide was adsorbed to soil and removed from solution as the streams traversed the soil‐lined channels. The removal rate increased with stream sediment concentration. Stream sediment concentrations were higher when PAM concentrations were <2 mg L −1 a.i., for early irrigations, and when untreated tributary flows combined with the stream. In these cases, PAM concentration decreased to undetectable levels over the flow lengths used in this study. When inflows contained >6 mg L −1 PAM a.i., stream sediment concentrations were minimal and PAM concentrations did not change down the furrow, though they decreased to undetectable levels within 0.5 h after application ceased. One percent of applied PAM was lost in tail‐ditch runoff. This loss could have been eliminated by treating only the furrow advance or not treating the last two irrigations.