z-logo
Premium
Molybdenum Content of Water Treatment Residuals
Author(s) -
Elliott H. A.,
Taylor M.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
journal of environmental quality
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.888
H-Index - 171
eISSN - 1537-2537
pISSN - 0047-2425
DOI - 10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900060014x
Subject(s) - backwashing , ferric , chloride , chemistry , filtration (mathematics) , water treatment , alum , molybdenum , coagulation , flocculation , environmental chemistry , nuclear chemistry , environmental engineering , environmental science , inorganic chemistry , psychology , organic chemistry , psychiatry , mechanical engineering , statistics , mathematics , engineering , inlet
Molybdenum (Mo) content of water treatment residuals (WTRs) was determined by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP‐AES) to evaluate suitability for land application under state regulatory policies that limit Mo to 18 mg kg −1 . Samples of WTR were collected from 32 Pennsylvania facilities that employ aluminum salts, ferric chloride, and/or polymers for coagulation. The mean Mo content of all samples was 3.1 mg kg −1 , with 78% having Mo levels <5 mg kg −1 . The WTRs from plants using ferric chloride as a coagulant averaged 5.6 mg Mo kg −1 , significantly higher ( p = 0.02) than the 1.6 mg Mo kg −1 for utilities using alum. Differences were related to coagulant purity: Mo content in liquid ferric chloride was 10.0 mg L −1 but below detection by ICP‐AES for alum. The initial sample from one facility, collected from the filter backwash basin, contained 26.4 mg Mo kg −1 . Elevated Mo in backwash solids was attributed to filtration capture of extremely fine, Mo‐enriched AI hydrous oxide particles and erosion of anthracite filter media during backwashing. Combined backwash and coagulation solids from this facility's storage lagoon averaged 6.3 mg Mo kg −1 , underscoring the need for consistent sampling procedures. The mean Cu to Mo ratio in these WTRs was >100, well above the minimum dietary ratio (2:1) considered protective of grazing animals.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here