z-logo
Premium
Purification of Fuel and Nitrate Contaminated Ground Water Using a Free Water Surface Constructed Wetland Plant
Author(s) -
Machate Thomas,
Heuermann Elisabeth,
Schramm KarlWerner,
Kettrup Antonius
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
journal of environmental quality
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.888
H-Index - 171
eISSN - 1537-2537
pISSN - 0047-2425
DOI - 10.2134/jeq1999.00472425002800050034x
Subject(s) - environmental chemistry , scirpus , typha , nitrate , chemistry , surface water , hydraulic retention time , environmental engineering , environmental science , wetland , wastewater , ecology , organic chemistry , biology
Contaminated ground water from a former coke plant site was purified in a free water surface (FWS) constructed wetland plant during a 3‐mo short‐term experiment. The pilot plant (total surface area 27 m 2 ) was filled with a 1 m thick lava‐gravel substrate planted with cattail ( Typha spp.) and bulrush ( Scirpus lacustris ). Major contaminants were low to moderate concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH 50–9000 µg L −1 according to USEPA, 1‐methylnaphthalene 2–1900 µg L −1 , 2‐methylnaphthalene 3–4300 µg L −1 ), BTEX (10–450 µg L −1 ), nitrate (60 mg L −1 as N), and nitrite (7 mg L −1 as N). The wetland was dosed at hydraulic loading rates of q A = 4.8 and 9.6 cm d −1 with a hydraulic residence time (HRT) of 13.7 and 6.8 d. The surface removal rates of PAH were between 98.8 and 1914 mg m −2 d −1 . Efficiency was always >99%. Extraction of lava gravel showed that approx. 0.4% of the applied PAH were retained on the substratum. The ratio of ∑2,3‐ring PAH and ∑4,5,6‐ring PAH showed a shift from 1:0.11 in water (influent) to 1:2.5 in lava (Tank 1). The removal of BTEX was >99%, but might be in part due to volatilization. The efficiency in the removal of nitrate was 91% (2.47–3.34 g m −2 d −1 ) and of nitrite was 97% (0.034–0.036 g m −2 d −1 ). Purification performance was not influenced by hydraulic loading rates or after die‐back of the macrophytes.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here