Premium
Nitrogen Removal in a Wastewater Reservoir: The Importance of Denitrification by Epiphytic Biofilms on Submersed Vegetation
Author(s) -
Eriksson Peder G.,
Weisner Stefan E. B.
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
journal of environmental quality
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.888
H-Index - 171
eISSN - 1537-2537
pISSN - 0047-2425
DOI - 10.2134/jeq1997.00472425002600030043x
Subject(s) - denitrification , macrophyte , epiphyte , denitrifying bacteria , periphyton , microcosm , eutrophication , aquatic plant , effluent , environmental chemistry , hydrology (agriculture) , nitrogen , algae , environmental science , nutrient , botany , ecology , chemistry , environmental engineering , biology , geology , geotechnical engineering , organic chemistry
The aim of this study was to examine the importance of epiphytic denitrifying bacteria on submersed vegetation in removing N from a shallow nutrient‐enriched freshwater ecosystem. The investigation was conducted during the summer of 1994 in a surface flow reservoir receiving municipal tertiary‐treated wastewater. The submersed vegetation in the reservoir was dominated by Potamogeton pectinatus L. and filamentous green algae (FGA). The N loading was 2300 mg N h −1 m −2 and the N removal, calculated as the mean difference between influent and effluent N, was 190 mg N h −1 m −2 (8%). The majority of influent N consisted of NH + 4 , but the main part of the N removal was due to the removal of NO − 3 whereas no net retention of NH + 4 was found. Mean total soluble solids and BOD 7 retention was 69 and 38%, respectively. Denitrification measurements were conducted in darkness at in situ temperature in microcosms with P. pectinatus , FGA, or intact sediment cores. Epiphytic denitrification ranged between 0.21 to 7.0 mg N h −1 m −2 reservoir surface area depending on the abundance of the submersed vegetation (5–140 g DW m −2 ). Sediment denitrification was 4.7 mg N h −1 m −2 reservoir surface area. The mean assimilative N uptake of the submersed vegetation and epiphyton was 3.4 and 1.6 mg N h −1 m −2 reservoir surface area, respectively. Measured N removal rates through plant uptake and denitrification could only account for a minor part of the N removal observed by mass balance. However, microcosm denitrification measurements underestimate actual denitrification. Thus, the major part of the N removal was most likely due to denitrification. In conclusion, this study indicates that denitrification in epiphytic microbial communities on submersed vegetation can be of significant importance for the N removal in nutrient‐enriched freshwater ecosystems.