Premium
Nitrogen Mineralization Kinetics in Soil During Long‐term Aerobic Laboratory Incubations: A Case Study
Author(s) -
Bonde Torben A.,
Lindberg Torbjorn
Publication year - 1988
Publication title -
journal of environmental quality
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.888
H-Index - 171
eISSN - 1537-2537
pISSN - 0047-2425
DOI - 10.2134/jeq1988.00472425001700030011x
Subject(s) - mineralization (soil science) , mathematics , mixed model , nonlinear regression , linear regression , chemistry , linear model , kinetics , regression analysis , nitrogen , statistics , thermodynamics , physics , organic chemistry , quantum mechanics
Literature data describing curves of cumulative net N mineralization characterized by an initial lag‐phase and obtained by long‐term (26 weeks) aerobic laboratory incubations were fitted to different regression models by means of nonlinear regression analysis. The model offering the most appropriate description of the data were selected on the basis of the residual sum of squares left unexplained by the regression. The models employed and compared to the classical first‐order model were a mixed‐order, one‐component model:N m = N 0 [ 1 ‐ exp ( ‐ h 1 t ‐ h 2 t 2 / 2 ) ]a mixed/first‐order, two‐component model:N m = N a [ 1 ‐ exp ( ‐ h 1 t ‐ h 2 t 2 / 2 ) ] + N r [ 1 ‐ exp ( ‐ k t ) ]and a simplified special case of the previous, mixed/linear, two‐component model:N m = N a [ 1 ‐ exp ( ‐ h 1 t ‐ h 2 t 2 / 2 ) ] + C t , t ≤ t i ,where N m and N 0 are the amount of mineralizable N present in the soil at time t and time 0; N a and N r are the amounts of mineralizable N initially present in the available and resistant fractions, respectively; t i equals length of incubation; rate constants h 1 and h 2 belong to the mixed‐order model; k is a first‐order rate constant; and C denotes the slope of the linear tail following the pattern described by the mixed‐order expression. Data from three soils, unamended or amended with manure, were best described by the mixed/first‐order or, alternatively, the mixed/linear model. The fit was significantly better than that offered by the classical first‐order, one‐component model. The prediction of potentially mineralizable nitrogen ( N 0 ) varied between 108 and 240 mg N kg −1 soil in an unamended soil, depending on the choice of model