Premium
Organic Amendments Improve Wheat Root Growth and Yield through Regulating Soil Properties
Author(s) -
Zhao Lili,
Li Lusheng,
Cai Huanjie,
Fan Junliang,
Chau Henry Wai,
Malone Robert W.,
Zhang Chao
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
agronomy journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.752
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1435-0645
pISSN - 0002-1962
DOI - 10.2134/agronj2018.04.0247
Subject(s) - agronomy , straw , soil fertility , environmental science , soil conditioner , organic matter , fertilizer , soil organic matter , soil structure , husk , bulk density , soil water , chemistry , soil science , biology , botany , organic chemistry
Core Ideas Organic amendments improved soil fertility and soil structure. Root density was quadratic correlated with water stable aggregates and macroporosity. Application of wheat straw yielded the best soil environment and crop productivity.Organic amendments prevent soil degradation and sustain crop production, but their effects on root growth and its functional responses to variations in soil properties have not been fully understood. A two‐year field experiment was conducted to investigate the impacts of organic amendments on soil properties, root growth, and grain yield of winter wheat ( Triticum durum Desf.) in the Guanzhong Plain (GZP), China. The five treatments were: application of mineral fertilizer alone (control, CO) and along with 20 Mg ha −1 of wheat straw (MWS), wheat husk (MWH), farmyard soil (MFS), and bioorganic fertilizer (MBF). Organic amendments increased soil organic matter (SOM, 7–15%) and total soil nitrogen (TSN, 5–15%) in the 0‐ to 40‐cm depth compared to the CO treatment. Meanwhile, organic amendments improved soil structure by increasing water stable aggregates (WSA, 5–16%) and macroporosity ( ε 10 , 27–47%). Compared to the CO treatment, organic amendments significantly increased the root length density (RLD) and root mass density (RMD) in the 20‐cm depth of soil at the flowering stage. The significantly higher RLD and RMD were also exhibited in the MWH and MFS treatments in the 20‐ to 100‐cm depth. Additionally, the responses of RLD and RMD to WSA and ε 10 were well‐described by quadratic equations based on all treatments. Importantly, the MWS treatment had the greatest grain yield among all five treatments with better soil fertility and structure. We suggested that the MWS treatment is an effective method for improving soil properties and crop productivity in the GZP.