Premium
Improving Breeding Efficiency of a Hybrid Maize Breeding Program Using a Three Heterotic‐Group Classification
Author(s) -
Fan XingMing,
Bi Yaqi,
Zhang Yudong,
Jeffers Daniel,
Yin XingFu,
Kang Manjit
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
agronomy journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.752
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1435-0645
pISSN - 0002-1962
DOI - 10.2134/agronj2017.05.0290
Subject(s) - heterotic string theory , breeding program , heterosis , subtropics , biology , agronomy , plant breeding , microbiology and biotechnology , mathematics , hybrid , cultivar , ecology , mathematical physics
Core Ideas Maize breeding efficiency can be greatly improved by adopting three heterotic groups in hybrid breeding. Using three heterotic groups improves maize breeding efficiency for using genetic resources. General breeding efficiency is used to measure efficiency of genetic resource usage, and specific breeding efficiency is to obtain maximum output with inputs. Suwan1 is an important heterotic group from tropical/subtropical and should be explore more worldwide.Heterotic group classification has a crucial impact on maize ( Zea mays L.) breeding efficiency in a hybrid‐based breeding program. The objectives of this study were to: (i) investigate whether or not breeding efficiency could be improved using a three heterotic‐group (TriHG) classification (Reid and non‐Reid, and Suwan1 heterotic groups) system instead of a usual two heterotic‐group (DiHG) classification (Reid and non‐Reid heterotic groups) system; and (ii) estimate the impact of TriHG and DiHG systems on breeding efficiency, utilizing the same data in computing specific breeding efficiency (SBE) and general breeding efficiency (GBE) in a subtropical breeding program in southern China. Twenty‐five adapted tropical and subtropical lines were crossed to six testers using a line × tester mating design. Data on grain yield were used to calculate SBE and GBE for comparing DiHG‐ and TriHG‐based strategies. The TriHG classification system increased GBE by 77.8% over the DiHG system without a significant loss in SBE. We concluded that the TriHG system was better than the DiHG system for improving maize‐breeding efficiency. Therefore, maize breeders may re‐think their breeding strategy for improving breeding efficiency in long‐term breeding programs by adopting the suggested TriHG system. Hybrid maize improvement programs, especially in the early stages of breeding for identifying hybrids with high yield potential, can be become more efficient by using three testers with one from each of Reid, nonReid, and Suwan1 heterotic groups. This would improve the chances of developing high‐yielding hybrids in a breeding program with the available, diverse germplasm.