Premium
The Reduction of Plant‐Available Nitrogen by Cover Crop Mulches and Subsequent Effects on Soybean Performance and Weed Interference
Author(s) -
Wells M. S.,
RebergHorton S. C.,
Smith A. N.,
Grossman J. M.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
agronomy journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.752
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1435-0645
pISSN - 0002-1962
DOI - 10.2134/agronj2012.0396
Subject(s) - agronomy , cover crop , weed , tillage , secale , weed control , sowing , crop , conventional tillage , dry matter , biomass (ecology) , biology
A 3 site‐year study was conducted to investigate the impact of roller‐crimped rye (RC) ( Secale cereale L.) mulches on soil N immobilization and subsequent effects on weed suppression and soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] yield. Treatments consisted of: (i) RC, (ii) conventional tillage with neither rye cover crop nor weed control measures (WC), (iii) conventional tillage plus herbicide weed control (CT+HB), and, (iv) roller‐crimped rye plus herbicide (RC+HB). The rye biomass varied between the sites with 4400, 8300, and 7084 kg ha −1 dry matter (DM) for Goldsboro 2009, Kinston 2009, and Kinston 2010, respectively. During the season, the flow of soil inorganic N was monitored via ion‐exchange probes and by direct extractions at two depths (0–10 and 10–25 cm) every 2 wk. Tissue data was collected every 2 wk on soybean and redroot pigweed ( Amaranthus retroflexus L.) to determine the C/N ratio. For all sites, peak N immobilization occurred between 4 and 6 weeks after planting (WAP), indicated by a reduction in soil inorganic N. Results from the ion‐exchange probes showed similar trends of the extractable soil inorganic N at all sites. Pigweed C/N ratios revealed a growing divergence between the two systems, with a severe N deficiency in the RC. Even with varying rye biomass production across environments the RC system created an extremely low N environment, suggesting that when a cereal cover crop is paired with a legume cash crop, reduced weed crop interference may result, with little reduction in soybean yield.