Premium
A Distributed Cotton Growth Model Developed from GOSSYM and Its Parameter Determination
Author(s) -
Liang XinZhong,
Xu Min,
Gao Wei,
Reddy K. Raja,
Kunkel Kenneth,
Schmoldt Daniel L.,
Samel Arthur N.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
agronomy journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.752
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1435-0645
pISSN - 0002-1962
DOI - 10.2134/agronj2011.0250
Subject(s) - evapotranspiration , yield (engineering) , environmental science , coupling (piping) , irrigation , model parameter , gossypium hirsutum , point (geometry) , climate model , mathematics , climate change , agronomy , statistics , ecology , biology , physics , engineering , mechanical engineering , geometry , thermodynamics
Prediction of cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) production under a changing climate requires a coupled modeling system that represents climate–cotton interactions. The existing cotton growth model GOSSYM has drawbacks that prohibit its effective coupling with climate models. We developed a geographically distributed cotton growth model from the original GOSSYM and optimized it for coupling with the regional Climate–Weather Research Forecasting model (CWRF). This included software redesign, physics improvement, and parameter specification for consistent coupling of CWRF and GOSSYM. Through incorporation of the best available physical representations and observational estimates, the long list of inputs in the original GOSSYM was reduced to two parameters, the initial NO 3 amount in the top 2 m of soil and the ratio of irrigated water amount to potential evapotranspiration. The geographic distributions of these two parameters are determined by optimization that minimizes model errors in simulating cotton yields. The result shows that the redeveloped GOSSYM realistically reproduces the geographic distribution of mean cotton yields in 30‐km grids, within ± 10% of observations across most of the U.S. Cotton Belt, whereas the original GOSSYM overestimated yields by 27 to 135% at the state level and 92% overall. Both models produced interannual yield variability with comparable magnitude; however, the temporal correspondence between modeled and observed interannual anomalies was much more realistic in the redeveloped than the original GOSSYM because significant ( P = 0.05) correlations were identified in 87 and 40% of harvest grids, respectively. The redeveloped GOSSYM provides a starting point for additional improvements and applications of the coupled CWRF–GOSSYM system to study climate–cotton interactions.