z-logo
Premium
Distribution and Use Efficiency of Photosynthetically Active Radiation in Strip Intercropping of Maize and Soybean
Author(s) -
Gao Yang,
Duan Aiwang,
Qiu Xinqiang,
Sun Jingsheng,
Zhang Junpeng,
Liu Hao,
Wang Hezhou
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
agronomy journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.752
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1435-0645
pISSN - 0002-1962
DOI - 10.2134/agronj2009.0409
Subject(s) - photosynthetically active radiation , intercropping , agronomy , crop , cambisol , canopy , zea mays , crop yield , mathematics , biology , soil water , botany , photosynthesis , ecology
An experiment was conducted at Shangqiu Agro‐Ecosystem Experimental Station in 2006–2008 to investigate the distribution and use efficiency of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR). The soil was classified as a Eutric Cambisol. Four treatments were compared: (i) sole crop maize ( Zea mays L.) (SM); (ii) sole crop soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] (SSB); (iii) three rows of soybean alternated with one row of maize (I 1 ); and (iv) three rows of soybean alternated with two rows of maize (I 2 ). Observed fraction of radiation intercepted (F), radiation use efficiency (RUE), and harvest index (HI) revealed that PAR transmittance at the bottom of the soybean canopy adjacent to the maize was higher than that farther from the maize. However, this difference decreased as the crops developed. The averaged extinction coefficient ( K ) and RUE were 0.51 and 2.82 g MJ −1 for I 1 and 0.50 and 2.78 g MJ −1 for I 2 , respectively, compared with 0.46 and 3.18 g MJ −1 for sole crop maize and 0.59 and 1.55 g MJ −1 for sole crop soybean. The HI of I 1 and I 2 were 0.45 and 0.44 for maize and 0.35 and 0.36 for soybean, respectively. The HI of sole crop maize and sole crop soybean were 0.42 and 0.40, respectively. The mean land equivalent ratio (LER) for I 1 and I 2 was 1.65 and 1.71, respectively. Therefore, it can be concluded that intercropping usually had greater RUE than sole cropping, which may account for the yield advantage of intercropping.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here