Premium
Economics of Irrigated Continuous Corn under Conventional‐Till and No‐Till in Northern Colorado
Author(s) -
Archer David W.,
Halvorson Ardell D.,
Reule Curtis A.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
agronomy journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.752
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1435-0645
pISSN - 0002-1962
DOI - 10.2134/agronj2007.0291
Subject(s) - tillage , loam , no till farming , agronomy , strip till , environmental science , conventional tillage , fertilizer , irrigation , yield (engineering) , greenhouse gas , mathematics , soil water , soil fertility , biology , ecology , soil science , materials science , metallurgy
Conversion of irrigated cropland from conventional tillage (CT) to no‐till (NT) could have several environmental benefits including reduced erosion potential, reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, and conservation of water. However NT must be economically viable if it is to be adopted. Costs of production and economic returns were evaluated for an irrigated, continuous corn ( Zea mays L.) system under CT and NT over 6 yr on a clay loam soil in northern Colorado. Yield responses to N fertilization were included to determine economic optimum fertilization rates under each tillage system. Corn grain yields at economic optimum N fertilizer rates were 1.1 to 1.4 Mg ha −1 lower for NT than for CT. However, net returns were $46 to 74 ha −1 higher for NT than for CT due to reductions in operating costs of $57 to 114 ha −1 and reductions in machinery ownership costs of $87 to 90 ha −1 . Operating cost savings were realized largely due to fuel and labor reductions of 75% and 71 to 72%, respectively, and in spite of higher N fertilizer requirements of 16 to 55 kg ha −1 for NT compared to CT. No‐till, irrigated, continuous corn appears to be an economically viable option for replacing CT production systems in the central Great Plains, especially when combined with the environmental benefits of the NT system.