Premium
Persistence of Glyphosate‐Resistant Canola in Western Canadian Cropping Systems
Author(s) -
Harker K. N.,
Clayton G. W.,
Blackshaw R. E.,
O'Donovan J. T.,
Johnson E. N.,
Gan Y.,
Holm F. A.,
Sapsford K. L.,
Irvine R. B.,
Van Acker R. C.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
agronomy journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.752
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1435-0645
pISSN - 0002-1962
DOI - 10.2134/agronj2005.0168
Subject(s) - canola , agronomy , field pea , brassica rapa , crop rotation , brassica , biology , hordeum vulgare , cropping system , sowing , sativum , crop , poaceae
Canola ( Brassica napus L.) is the most important oilseed crop in western Canada. Its prevalence across the Canadian Prairies influences the occurrence and impact of canola volunteers as weeds. Here we determined the persistence of canola seed in cropping systems so effective volunteer management strategies can be developed. In mid‐ to late‐October of 2000, approximately 770 seeds m −2 of glyphosate [ N ‐(phosphonomethyl)glycine]–resistant (GR) canola were scattered on plot areas at seven western Canadian sites. From 2001 to 2003 the plots were seeded to a wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)–field pea ( Pisum sativum L.)–barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) rotation or a fallow–field pea–fallow rotation in five different seeding systems involving seeding dates and soil disturbance levels, and monitored four times each year for canola plant density. Crop seeding date did not consistently influence volunteer canola density. With some exceptions, higher levels of soil disturbance led to higher volunteer canola densities. The vast majority of canola seedlings were recruited in the year following seed dispersal (2001). Across all locations, rotations, and seeding systems, and averaged over preplanting (PREP) and in‐crop prespray (PRES) intervals, canola densities were 6.2, 0.7, and 0.0 plants m −2 in 2001, 2002, and 2003, respectively. Canola volunteers were usually most abundant at PREP and PRES intervals; total recruitment at those intervals averaged across all seeding systems in the continuous cropping rotation was 3% (25 plants m −2 ). Preventing seed production in new canola volunteers in 2001 reduced canola densities in subsequent years (2002 and 2003) below those required to mitigate weed–crop competition influences in most crops.