z-logo
Premium
Estimating Site‐Specific Nitrogen Crop Response Functions: A Conceptual Framework and Geostatistical Model
Author(s) -
Hurley T. M.,
Malzer G. L.,
Kilian B.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
agronomy journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.752
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1435-0645
pISSN - 0002-1962
DOI - 10.2134/agronj2004.1331
Subject(s) - heteroscedasticity , profitability index , econometrics , novelty , precision agriculture , statistics , mathematics , agricultural engineering , random effects model , agriculture , economics , ecology , engineering , biology , medicine , philosophy , meta analysis , theology , finance
Confirming the precision agriculture hypothesis for variable‐rate N applications (VRAs) is challenging. To confront this challenge, researchers have used increasingly sophisticated statistical models to estimate and compare site‐specific crop response functions (SSCRFs). While progress has been made, it has been hampered by the lack of a conceptual framework to guide the development of appropriate statistical models. This paper provides such a framework and demonstrates its utility by developing a heteroscedastic, fixed and random effects, geostatistical model to test if VRA can increase N returns. The novelty of the model is the inclusion of site, spatial, treatment, and treatment strip heteroscedasticity and correlation. Applied to data collected in 1995 from two corn ( Zea mays L.) N response experiments in south‐central Minnesota, results demonstrate the importance of including site, spatial, treatment, and treatment strip effects in the estimation of SSCRFs. Results also indicate a significant potential for VRA to increase N returns and that these potential returns increase as the area of the management unit decreases. At one location, there was greater than a 95% chance that VRA could have increased profitability if the cost of implementing VRA was less than $14.5 ha −1 . At the other location, if implementation costs were less than $48.3 ha −1 , there was greater than a 95% chance of increased profitability.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here