Premium
Identifying Soil Properties that Influence Cotton Yield Using Soil Sampling Directed by Apparent Soil Electrical Conductivity
Author(s) -
Corwin D. L.,
Lesch S. M.,
Shouse P. J.,
Soppe R.,
Ayars J. E.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
agronomy journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.752
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1435-0645
pISSN - 0002-1962
DOI - 10.2134/agronj2003.3520
Subject(s) - soil test , salinity , soil texture , agronomy , yield (engineering) , environmental science , soil science , spatial variability , soil water , mathematics , statistics , ecology , materials science , metallurgy , biology
Crop yield inconsistently correlates with apparent soil electrical conductivity (EC a ) because of the influence of soil properties (e.g., salinity, water content, texture, etc.) that may or may not influence yield within a particular field and because of a temporal component of yield variability that is poorly captured by a state variable such as EC a . Nevertheless, in instances where yield correlates with EC a , maps of EC a are useful for devising soil sampling schemes to identify soil properties influencing yield within a field. A west side San Joaquin Valley field (32.4 ha) was used to demonstrate how spatial distributions of EC a can guide a soil sample design to determine the soil properties influencing seed cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.; ‘MAXXA’ variety) yield. Soil sample sites were selected with a statistical sample design utilizing spatial EC a measurements. Statistical results are presented from correlation and regression analyses between cotton yield and the properties of pH, B, NO 3 –N, Cl − , salinity, leaching fraction (LF), gravimetric water content, bulk density, percentage clay, and saturation percentage. Correlation coefficients of −0.01, 0.50, −0.03, 0.25, 0.53, −0.49, 0.42, −0.29, 0.36, and 0.38, respectively, were determined. A site‐specific response model of cotton yield was developed based on ordinary least squares regression analysis and adjusted for spatial autocorrelation using maximum likelihood. The response model indicated that salinity, plant‐available water, LF, and pH were the most significant soil properties influencing cotton yield at the study site. The correlations and response model provide valuable information for site‐specific management.