z-logo
Premium
Phasic Development of Rice Seedlings
Author(s) -
Salam Moin U.,
Jones James W.,
Jones John G. W.
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
agronomy journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.752
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1435-0645
pISSN - 0002-1962
DOI - 10.2134/agronj1997.00021962008900040018x
Subject(s) - dry matter , seedling , shoot , cultivar , oryza sativa , agronomy , biology , dry weight , crop , greenhouse , horticulture , gene , biochemistry
A better understanding of growth and developmental processes of rice ( Oryza sativa L .) seedlings is necessary for crop management and modeling perspectives. This experiment was conducted to identify preautotrophic phases of rice seedlings, quantify seed dry matter mobilization and utilization, characterize dry matter partitioning during early growth, and observe if these processes are affected by cultivar and seed size. Seeds of two cultivars, each separated into two seed sizes, were sown in a greenhouse using field soil, and observations on seed weight loss and seedling weight gain were recorded daily for 27 d. The durations of heterotrophic and transition phases were determined as 74 and 247 thermal units (base temperature 9°C), respectively. Seeds lost 0.79 ± 0.010 g g− 1 during the preautotrophic phases, while 0.42 ± 0.023 g g− 1 seed weight accumulated in the seedling. Partitioning of dry matter was equal between root and shoot up to 37 thermal units, then allocation to root reduced curvilinearly until a constant root‐to‐shoot ratio (15:85) was reached at 148 thermal units and maintained thereafter. Shoot dry matter partitioning between culm and leaf was almost equal throughout the experiment except for the initial 37 thermal units when all dry matter accumulated in the culm. Early developmental processes in rice seedlings were independent of cultivar and seed size in this study. Although seed dry matter loss in proportion to the initial seed dry matter was significantly higher for larger seeds, the utilization pattern remained unaffected by seed size. This indicates that larger seeds were less efficient than smaller seeds in the utilization of reserves.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here