Premium
Prediction of Ruminal Protein Degradability of Forages Using near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy
Author(s) -
Halgerson James L.,
Sheaffer Craig C.,
Hesterman Oran B.,
Griffin Timothy S.,
Stern Marshall D.,
Randall Gyles W.
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
agronomy journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.752
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1435-0645
pISSN - 0002-1962
DOI - 10.2134/agronj1995.00021962008700060033x
Subject(s) - near infrared reflectance spectroscopy , forage , in situ , medicago sativa , agronomy , extraction (chemistry) , dry matter , zoology , protease , rumen , chemistry , biology , food science , chromatography , biochemistry , near infrared spectroscopy , enzyme , fermentation , organic chemistry , neuroscience
Ruminal protein degradability is an important trait affecting forage quality, but in situ procedures used to characterize protein degradability are costly and time consuming. Our objectives were to compare an in situ procedure with a ficin protease extraction procedure for estimating ruminal protein degradability of forages and to determine whether near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) can provide similar estimates of protein degradability compared to either method. Ruminal protein degradability of five cool‐season perennial grasses and alfalfa was determined using the ficin protease procedure. Ficin‐extracted crude protein (CP) represents that portion of CP that is solubilized in the extraction procedure; it accounted for 66% (in grasses) to 93% [in alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)] of the variation of in situ degradable crude protein. NIRS accurately predicted in situ and ficin degradability on a dry matter basis, but not on a CP basis. We concluded that the ficin procedure could substitute for the in situ determination of ruminal degradable protein and that NIRS could be used to predict protein degradability determined by either method.