Premium
Fate of 15 N‐Depleted Ammonium Nitrate Applied to No–Tillage and Conventional Tillage Corn 1
Author(s) -
Kitur B. K.,
Smith M. S.,
Blevins R. L.,
Frye W. W.
Publication year - 1984
Publication title -
agronomy journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.752
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1435-0645
pISSN - 0002-1962
DOI - 10.2134/agronj1984.00021962007600020016x
Subject(s) - tillage , loam , agronomy , fertilizer , ammonium nitrate , leaching (pedology) , stover , conventional tillage , plough , nitrogen , chemistry , zoology , field experiment , soil water , environmental science , biology , soil science , organic chemistry
Crop recovery and soil immobilization of fertilizer N under two different tillage systems was observed in a 3‐year study. Corn ( Zea mays L.) was fertilized with 84 or 168 kg N ha −1 as 15 N‐depleted NH 4 NO 3 . Nitrogen was surface applied as a solution on a Maury silt loam soil (fine , mixed, mesic Typic Paleudalfs). There was no mechanical disturbance of the soil in the no‐tillage treatment (NT); conventional tillage (CT) consisted of spring plowing and disking. Grain yields with NT tended to be lower than yields with CT at the low N rate but equal or greater at the high N rate. However, these differences were not statistically significant. In 1980 fertilizer recovery in grain was 21 vs. 38 kg N ha −1 for NT and CT, respectively, at the low N rate. At the high N rate, N recovery by corn grown under NT and CT was not significantly different. Results were similar in 1981. After adding 15 N‐depleted fertilizer to the same plots for 3 years, 71 to 75% of the fertilizer was accounted for in harvested grain, stover, or soil. Neither tillage nor N rate had a large effect on the fraction of fertilizer N missing and presumed lost by denitrification and leaching. Nitrogen fertilizer remaining in the NT soil was 42% of that applied at the low fertilizer rate and 39% of that applied at the high N rate. In the CT plots apparent immobilization was 28 and 37% for the low and the high N rate, respectively. Approximately one‐half of the N apparently immobilized was located in the surface 5 cm of the NT soil, but immobilized N was more uniformly distributed in the top 30 cm of the CT soil. Increased immobilization of N at the surface of the NT soil seems to be the most likely explanation for reduced crop recovery of fertilizer with NT at low N rates.