z-logo
Premium
Seasonal Patterns of Forage Quality of Weeping Lovegrass Cultivars 1
Author(s) -
Holt E. C.,
Dalrymple R. L.
Publication year - 1979
Publication title -
agronomy journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.752
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1435-0645
pISSN - 0002-1962
DOI - 10.2134/agronj1979.00021962007100010014x
Subject(s) - forage , agronomy , growing season , dry matter , biology , cultivar , grazing , dry season , ecology
Weeping lovegrass ( Eragrostis curvula (Schrad.) Nees) is used for grazing in both the growing season and the dormant season, yet little information is available on seasonal patterns of forage digestibility, particularly in the dormant season. A study was conducted to determine the influence of N on dry matter digestibility of forage in the growing season and stockpiled forage in the dormant season. Four cultivars with known differences in forage palatibility were fertilized at three N levels and harvested at intervals during the growing and dormant seasons. In vitro digestible dry matter (IVDDM) was determined during a 3‐year period. ‘Morpa’ and ‘Renner,’ both selected for palability, tended to be higher in IVDDM than ‘Ermelo’ and ‘Common’ weeping lovegrass. The initial spring growth ranged from 60 to 67% IVDDM. Digestibility declined 10 to 20 units from April to August or September, increased in August or September in some years, and then declined to lows of 28 to 48% in January and February. Renner and Morpa showed more August–September recovery in IVDDM than Ermelo and Common. Neither the amount nor time of N fertilization had any influence on forage digestibility. Seasonal differences in digestibility were greater than cultivar differences. Forage digestibility in both midsummer and midwinter may reach low enough levels to limit animal performance if not supplemented.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here