z-logo
Premium
Symposium on Forage Evaluation: V. Intake and Digestibility Techniques and Supplemental Feeding in Range Forage Evaluation 1
Author(s) -
Harris Lorin E.,
Cook C. Wayne,
Butcher John E.
Publication year - 1959
Publication title -
agronomy journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.752
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1435-0645
pISSN - 0002-1962
DOI - 10.2134/agronj1959.00021962005100040013x
Subject(s) - butcher , forage , animal husbandry , library science , zoology , history , political science , agronomy , biology , computer science , law , agriculture , archaeology
TN THE Intermountain Area a major portion of the sheep -*• and cattle subsist on open range (31). In the winter, they graze on semi-deserts (figure 1), in the spring and fall on foothills, and in the summer on the higher mountains. These ranges have a diversity of soil, climate, topography, and vegetation. Therefore, the animal's diet is usually highly variable. The diet may be deficient in essential nutrients or may actually contain an excess of certain constituents that are toxic or poisonous. There are two main approaches to nutritional problems on range lands. The first is to measure the nutritive value of the plants which the animals consume. The phases included in this approach have been outlined by Harris et al. (30). They include (1) the determination of factors that affect the chemical composition of a given plant species on the range (13), (2) the botanical composition and nutritive content of the animal's diet (12, 16, 17, 18, 36, 54), and (3) the feeding of supplements to correct dietary deficiencies or toxicities (30, 56). The second approach is to obtain animal measures which reflect the nutritive state of the animal, such as the nitrogen-

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here