Premium
Root Recovery Development and Activity of Cotton Plants after Waterlogging
Author(s) -
Liu Ruixian,
Yang Changqin,
Zhang Guowei,
Zhang Lei,
Yang Fuqiang,
Guo Wenqi
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
agronomy journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.752
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1435-0645
pISSN - 0002-1962
DOI - 10.2134/agronj14.0567
Subject(s) - waterlogging (archaeology) , agronomy , biology , dry matter , shoot , cultivar , root system , horticulture , photosynthesis , botany , ecology , wetland
Cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) yield is severely limited by waterlogging in some global production areas. The objective was to study physiological and biochemical mechanisms of cotton root recovery after waterlogging during different reproductive stages. Cotton plants (cultivar Simian 3) were subjected to waterlogging for 10 d and then permitted to recover for 20 d. Waterlogging significantly reduced root dry matter, root vigor, and net photosynthetic rate ( P n ). After the termination of waterlogging, root growth showed a significant recovery. Root dry matter of waterlogged plants increased quickly, but remained 20 to 30% lower than controls. Total N content in waterlogged cotton roots was the same as controls at 20 d after waterlogging during the squaring stage, but was significantly lower during the flowering and boll‐forming stage. The activities of superoxide dismutase, catalase, and peroxidase in waterlogged plants increased for 10 d after waterlogging, then declined slowly. The malondialdehyde content in waterlogged roots continued to increase for 5 d after waterlogging, then declined to a significantly lower level than the control. Root vigor recovered rapidly after waterlogging, and was much higher than the control during the squaring stage, but significantly lower during flowering and boll‐forming stage. P n of waterlogged cotton was suppressed after a 10‐d recovery period, and remained lower than well‐watered controls. These results suggest (i) roots of waterlogged cotton recovered more quickly than shoots, (ii) cotton roots recover better from oxidant damage due to waterlogging during the squaring stage than during the flowering and boll‐forming stage.