Premium
Use of Nitrogen Fertilizer in a Targeted Way to Improve Grain Yield, Quality, and Nitrogen Use Efficiency
Author(s) -
Hooper Peter,
Zhou Yi,
Coventry David R.,
McDonald Glenn K.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
agronomy journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.752
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1435-0645
pISSN - 0002-1962
DOI - 10.2134/agronj14.0363
Subject(s) - sowing , agronomy , nitrogen , yield (engineering) , mediterranean climate , canopy , fertilizer , grain yield , growing season , environmental science , mathematics , grain quality , biology , chemistry , ecology , materials science , organic chemistry , metallurgy
Nitrogen fertilizer management in rainfed Mediterranean environments can be financially risky because of the strong interaction between N and water availability on yield. This study was conducted to investigate whether the use of split‐applications of N fertilizer that targeted specific growth stages could improve grain yield, grain protein concentration (GPC), and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) of dryland wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.). Experiments with 7 N‐application timings, two N‐rates, and two wheat varieties were conducted at two sites over two seasons. Despite the seasonal rainfall in both years being below the historic averages, delayed or split N applications were able to significantly increase grain yield (2.50 vs. 2.25 t ha −1 ), GPC (14.0 vs. 12.4%), N uptake (111.2 vs. 101.2 kg ha −1 ), N harvest index (70.7 vs. 61.7%), agronomic efficiency (4.6 vs. 1.7 kg kg −1 ), and apparent recovery (59.3 vs. 44.6%) compared with N applied only at sowing. No single N treatment was able to consistently produce the highest yield, GPC or NUE across the N rates, locations, and years because of the influence of timing and amount of rainfall during the season. Compared with applying all the N at sowing a targeted use of N, using split/delayed N applications at specific growth stages to manage canopy development in response to the seasonal pattern of rainfall, increased yield, quality, and NUE, even in years with below average rainfall, thus lessening exposure to financial risk with rainfed wheat in dry years.